Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 November 20243348597

Miry Carr Farm, Sandhills, Thorner, Leeds, LS14 3DP

Planning appeal 3348597 at Miry Carr Farm, Sandhills, Thorner, Leeds, LS14 3DP (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 20 November 2024 by Inspector Morgan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect on openness.

demolition of existing agricultural buildings and construction of two dwellings with associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Morgan R
Postcode
LS14 3DP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect on openness
  • whether the proposal would comply with policy requirements for an overall net gain for biodiversity
  • whether satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers would be achieved, with particular regard to outdoor amenity space
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the resulting harm, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, compounded by failure to meet biodiversity policy requirements and inadequate outdoor amenity space provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy N33Core Strategy Policy H2Policy GB4Core Strategy Policy G9Core Strategy Policy P10Saved UDP Policy BD5Saved UDP Policy GP5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed13 October 20266011132
    Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
  2. Dismissed12 October 20266011503
    Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266009680
    The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
  4. Allowed12 August 20266005793
    Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
  5. Dismissed24 July 20266006233
    Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.