Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20253348806

Wickham House , Station Road, Braughing , Ware Herts, SG11 2PB

the extension and change of use from existing commercial to 4no. residential units

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Williams K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would comply with local and national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding
  • whether the proposal is in a suitable location having particular regard to the accessibility of the site
  • whether appropriate measures to mitigate against climate change are proposed

What decided it

The proposal fails to apply the Sequential Test and does not demonstrate that reasonably available sites with lower probability of flooding have been considered, contrary to Policies WAT1 and WAT5 and Framework paragraphs 170 and 173-179.

The failure to adequately address flood risk and conflict with development plan and national policy on flood risk, to which significant weight is attached, outweighs the neutral matters and limited benefits of the proposal; the tilted balance at paragraph 11d)ii does not apply due to strong reasons for refusal relating to flood risk.

Framework references: 11, 110, 170, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179

Plan policies cited: Policy WAT1, Policy WAT5, Policy DPS2, Policy TRA1, Policy CC1, Policy CC2

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney (2018); Bernard Wheatcroft v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.