Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 January 20253348840

Sear Farm, Harlington Road, Upper Sundon, Luton, LU3 3PE

Planning appeal 3348840 at Sear Farm, Harlington Road, Upper Sundon, Luton, LU3 3PE (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 24 January 2025 by Inspector Rawle S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the demolition of existing buildings and erection of nine dwellings and a new estate road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rawle S
Postcode
LU3 3PE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt and on the purposes of including land within the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether or not it would conserve and enhance the landscape beauty of the Chilterns National Landscape
  • The effect of the proposal on the significance of a heritage asset
  • Whether or not the harm by reason of the proposal being inappropriate development within the Green Belt, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm to openness, character and appearance, and a non-designated heritage asset, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The significant weight given to housing supply and other modest benefits did not outweigh the substantial weight attached to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, openness and purposes) combined with moderate weight given to character/appearance and heritage asset harm, so very special circumstances did not exist and the tilted balance was disengaged in favour of a normal balance under which the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy HQ8Policy EE5Policy EE7Policy HE3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 67Paragraph 68Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
Judgments
NRS Saredon Aggregates v SSLUHC & Another [2023] EWHC 2795 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  2. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266005439
    263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266007697
    142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.