Planning appeal decision
Cherry Tree Stables Ltd, Stoke Charity Road, Kings Worthy, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2RP
Planning appeal 3349262 at Cherry Tree Stables Ltd, Stoke Charity Road, Kings Worthy, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2RP (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2025 by Inspector Leonard S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for a permanent rural worker's dwelling having regard to the Council's development plan settlement strategy, with particular regard to whether the equestrian business is financially sound.
use of an existing temporary dwelling as a permanent on-site dwelling for occupation as an equestrian manager's dwelling
- Authority
- Winchester City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- SO21 2RP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for a permanent rural worker's dwelling having regard to the Council's development plan settlement strategy, with particular regard to whether the equestrian business is financially sound
- The impact of the proposal on the integrity of the Solent Special Protection Areas (the SPAs), with particular regard to nitrogen and phosphorus input
What decided it
The appellants' failure to demonstrate that the equestrian business was financially sound, combined with the absence of secured mitigation for the Solent SPAs, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan and the Habitat Regulations.
The limited economic and social benefits of retaining a single rural worker's dwelling did not outweigh the harm arising from the unproven financial soundness of the business and the adverse effect on the integrity of the Solent SPAs, and as the tilted balance was not engaged the appeal was dismissed in accordance with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy MTRA4Policy DM11Policy DM12Policy CP16Policy H11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Winchester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 October 20266012051Cupressus, Durley Brook Road, Southampton, SO32 2AR
- Dismissed14 October 20266011078Oakridge, Biddenfield Lane, Shedfield, SO32 2HP
- Allowed10 August 20266005547Land at Lower Paddock, Bent Lane, Hambledon, PO7 4QP
- Dismissed3 August 202660042333, Farm Cottages, Knowle, PO17 5LZ
- Allowed29 July 2026600546362 Downs Road,, South Wonston,, Winchester, SO21 3EW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®