Planning appeal decision
Plot 3A, Wineham Lane, Wineham, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9AZ
Planning appeal 3350118 at Plot 3A, Wineham Lane, Wineham, Henfield, West Sussex, BN5 9AZ (Horsham District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 May 2025 by Inspector Perrins R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The character and appearance of the area and countryside location.
without planning permission, the material change of use of the land to use for the stationing of caravans for the purposes of human habitation together with the associated operational development comprising the importation of soil and waste material to create a hard surface, the installation of a septic tank in the approximate position shown hatched brown on the attached plan, installation of a water treatment plant in the approximate position hatched blue on the attached plan and the construction of a building/wooden structure used in connection with the unauthorised residential use
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Perrins R
- Postcode
- BN5 9AZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The character and appearance of the area and countryside location.
- The ecology, biodiversity and hydrology of the area.
- The Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar sites in relation to water neutrality.
- Whether there are any other considerations that would outweigh any harm identified.
What decided it
The likely significant effect on the integrity of the Arun Valley SAC, SPA and Ramsar site in relation to water neutrality, which under NPPF paragraph 193(a) alone was sufficient to warrant refusal.
The substantial harms to character and appearance, ecology/biodiversity/hydrology and the integrity of the SAC/SPA/Ramsar site, together with moderate weight against intentional unauthorised development, outweighed the significant weight given to unmet gypsy and traveller need and lack of alternative sites, and the substantial weight given to the children's best interests and personal circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- HDPF Policy 2HDPF Policy 23HDPF Policy 25HDPF Policy 26HDPF Policy 32HDPF Policy 33HDPF Policy 24HDPF Policy 31
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 195Paragraph 193Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 20266008830Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
- Allowed12 October 20266011680Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP
- Allowed25 September 20266010268Priory Field Barn, Monastery Lane, Storrington, RH20 4LN
- Allowed24 September 20266007772The Lamb Inn, Lambs Green, Rusper, RH12 4RG
- Notice upheld16 September 20263373450Development Site Lot 3, Kent Street, Cowfold, West Sussex, RH13 8BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®