Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 April 20263350392

39 Harrington Gardens, Kensington And Chelsea, London, SW7 4JU

Planning appeal 3350392 at 39 Harrington Gardens, Kensington And Chelsea, London, SW7 4JU (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 13 April 2026 by Inspector Cullen F, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building, 39 Harrington Gardens SW7.

Internal and external alterations - a full description of the proposed works can be found in the Heritage Statement

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cullen F
Postcode
SW7 4JU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building, 39 Harrington Gardens SW7

What decided it

The moderate level of less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II* listed building was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of the scheme.

The significant weight attached to the moderate level of less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance outweighed the moderate weight given to the public benefits, including heritage benefits, of the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CD5Policy CL4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 214Paragraph 215Paragraph 167Paragraph 57
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney (2018); Bernard Wheatcroft v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982); R. (Palmer) v Herefordshire Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 817 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.