Planning appeal decision
39 Harrington Gardens, Kensington And Chelsea, London, SW7 4JU
Planning appeal 3350392 at 39 Harrington Gardens, Kensington And Chelsea, London, SW7 4JU (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 13 April 2026 by Inspector Cullen F, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building, 39 Harrington Gardens SW7.
Internal and external alterations - a full description of the proposed works can be found in the Heritage Statement
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cullen F
- Postcode
- SW7 4JU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building, 39 Harrington Gardens SW7
What decided it
The moderate level of less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II* listed building was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of the scheme.
The significant weight attached to the moderate level of less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance outweighed the moderate weight given to the public benefits, including heritage benefits, of the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CD5Policy CL4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 214Paragraph 215Paragraph 167Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney (2018); Bernard Wheatcroft v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982); R. (Palmer) v Herefordshire Council [2016] EWCA Civ 1061
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
- Allowed23 June 20263362698Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
- Dismissed15 June 20266001948Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
- Dismissed2 June 20263376699Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
- Dismissed19 May 20266003102Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®