Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld11 December 20243350446

Land adjacent to 1705 Lincoln Road, Peterborough, PE6 7HH

Change of use of land to use as residential caravan site for 4 gypsy/traveller families, each with two caravans including no more than one static caravan/mobile home, including laying of hardstanding, erection of 2 amenity build ings and improvement of existing access. Summary

Authority
Peterborough City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Pleasant L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal B: the provision of and need for and supply of Gypsy and traveller pitches
  • Appeal B: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Appeal B: the effect on the aims and function of the Green Wedge
  • Appeal B: whether the development provides acceptable living conditions for the occupiers of the site, having particular regard to noise
  • Appeal B: whether the development makes adequate provision for surface water and foul drainage
  • Appeal A: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Appeal A: the effect on the aims and function of the Green Wedge
  • Appeal A: whether the development provides acceptable living conditions for the occupiers of the site, having regard to noise and privacy
  • Appeal A: whether the development makes adequate provision for the surface water and foul drainage
  • Appeal A: the effect of the development on biodiversity/ecology

What decided it

The critical distinction was that Appeal B's proposal (with defined layout, drainage and biodiversity mitigation secured by condition) avoided unmitigable harm, whereas the unauthorised development in Appeal A caused harm to landscape character, biodiversity and drainage that could not be resolved within the notice land, and that unmitigated harm outweighed the countervailing need and personal circumstances.

In Appeal B, no conflict with the development plan was found and the significant weight from the lack of a 5-year gypsy/traveller site supply tipped the balance in favour of allowing the appeal; in Appeal A, significant weight given to harm to landscape character, biodiversity and drainage outweighed the need for gypsy/traveller sites, the lack of alternative accommodation and personal circumstances, so the enforcement notice was upheld.

Framework references: 135, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy LP10, Policy LP16, Policy LP17, Policy LP26, Policy LP27, Policy LP28, Policy LP32

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.