Planning appeal decision
145 - 151 Kingsway, Hove, BN3 4GR
Planning appeal 3350527 at 145 - 151 Kingsway, Hove, BN3 4GR (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector Harley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area taking particular account of the location within the Pembroke and Princes Conservation Area.
demolish two pairs of semi-detached dwellings and erect a block of approximately 42 apartments, together with associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Harley S
- Postcode
- BN3 4GR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area taking particular account of the location within the Pembroke and Princes Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties
- whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed apartments
What decided it
The major adverse effect on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties, particularly through loss of daylight and sunlight, combined with the failure to secure affordable housing contributions and the over-developed, poor quality design, outweighed the housing supply benefits despite the tilted balance applying.
The substantial shortfall in five-year housing land supply and the provision of much-needed two-bedroom dwellings in an accessible location weighed heavily in favour, but this was outweighed by the major adverse effects on neighbouring living conditions, the failure to meet affordable housing policy requirements, and the over-developed, poor quality design that conflicted with development plan policies and the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP12Policy CP14Policy CP20Policy DM18Policy DM20Policy DM26Policy DM1Policy DM40Policy CP10Policy DM37Policy DM19
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 125Paragraph 130Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 June 202660067942 Tumulus Road, Saltdean, Brighton, BN2 8FS
- Allowed1 April 202660021773 Rugby Place, Brighton, BN2 5JB
- Allowed27 January 20263375220Site Of Former Electricity Sub Station, Manor Gardens, Lions Court, Brighton, BN2 5EB
- Dismissed22 January 20263369261Land To The East Of 10 Linchmere Avenue , Saltdean , Brighton , East Sussex, BN2 8LE
- Quashed On Legal Grounds22 October 20253349007Flat 14, Thomas House Clifton Hill, Brighton, BN1 3EN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®