Planning appeal decision
Sutton Circuits, Sutton Lane, Sutton in the Elms, Leicestershire, LE9 6QF
Planning appeal 3350897 at Sutton Circuits, Sutton Lane, Sutton in the Elms, Leicestershire, LE9 6QF (Harborough District Council) was dismissed on 20 June 2025 by Inspector Pearce S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the development proposed, having regard to the development plan.
the “change of use from holiday accommodation to a retirement village”
- Authority
- Harborough District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Pearce S
- Postcode
- LE9 6QF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the development proposed, having regard to the development plan
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the development proposed on biodiversity, including Biodiversity Net Gain
- whether a planning obligation is necessary in respect of matters relating to affordable housing, healthcare and highway considerations
- the effect of the proposed development on the economic conditions and sustainability of the area
- if any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by the alternative holiday lodge development
What decided it
The conflict with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly the unsuitability of the location for permanent residential development requiring car dependency, combined with unacceptable harm to character and appearance and unresolved ecology concerns, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing supply benefits even under the tilted balance.
The benefits of housing delivery and specialist housing for the over-50s, together with economic and social benefits, were outweighed by the significant harm to location suitability, character and appearance, biodiversity, and the absence of a completed planning obligation, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GD2Policy GD4Policy H4Policy GD8Policy GI5Policy GD1Policy IN2Policy IN1Policy H2Broughton Astley Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Policy H3Broughton Astley Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Policy SD1Broughton Astley Neighbourhood Plan 2014 Policy CI1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Harborough
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 20266011211Land East of Kilworth Road, Walton, LE17 6JG
- Dismissed6 October 20266008843The Grange, Arnesby Road, Fleckney, LE8 8AQ
- Dismissed2 October 2026600924567 Main Street, Bushby, LE7 9PL
- Allowed1 October 20266008177Land to the West of Leicester Road (B6047), Leicester Road, Market Harborough, LE16 7QT
- Dismissed17 September 20266009409Godolphin House Stables, Broughton Lane, Leire, LE17 5ER
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®