Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20253350999

Heathfield, Reading Road, Lower Shiplake, HENLEY-ON-THAMES, RG9 3JN

the erection of 2no. dwellings including provision of new access

Authority
South Oxfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rogers J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is suitable for the proposal, with particular regard to the local development strategy on the location of housing
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on biodiversity

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole, particularly the neighbourhood plan's location strategy and character and biodiversity policies, and the significant weight given to these conflicts is not outweighed by the modest housing benefits in circumstances where the neighbourhood plan was made within five years of the decision.

The modest benefits from housing delivery and self-build provision, and modest weight given to the conflict with the neighbourhood plan policy on location, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant weight attached to the proposal's conflict with the development plan as a whole, particularly the harm to character and appearance and biodiversity, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 14

Plan policies cited: Policy SV1, Policy SV2, Policy STRAT1, Policy H1, Policy H8, Policy H16, Policy DES1, Policy DES2, Policy ENV1, Policy ENV3, Policy SV7, Policy SV13, Policy SV15, Policy SV24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.