Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 April 20253351591

43 Oatlands Chase, WEYBRIDGE, KT13 9RP

the Retrospective Variation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) of planning permission 2021/1701 (Terrace of 3 two-storey houses) to amend the ridge height of the houses without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2024/0378 dated 8 May 2024

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sylvester G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition is necessary and reasonable in the interests of meeting a local housing need for smaller homes
  • Whether the disputed condition is necessary and reasonable in the interests of safeguarding the living conditions of nearby residents with particular regard to privacy
  • Whether the disputed condition is necessary and reasonable in the interests of safeguarding the living conditions of existing occupiers of the appeal development with particular regard to external garden space
  • Whether the disputed condition is necessary and reasonable in the interests of avoiding an increase in flood risk

What decided it

The condition is reasonable and necessary to restrict roof alterations and enlargements under Classes B and C of the GPDO to preserve the dwellings as smaller homes meeting local housing need under Policy DM10, but not justified for Class A extensions.

Framework references: 55, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy DM10, Policy DM2, Policy CS26

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.