Planning appeal decision
Land West Of Bramblings, C151 Eastgate Junction To Tranwell Woods Junction, Tranwell Woods, Northumberland, NE61 6AQ
Planning appeal 3351827 at Land West Of Bramblings, C151 Eastgate Junction To Tranwell Woods Junction, Tranwell Woods, Northumberland, NE61 6AQ (Northumberland County Council) was dismissed on 29 May 2025 by Inspector Livingstone C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the framework and any relevant development plan policies.
for construction of 2 no. eco executive self-build houses (C3 use)
- Authority
- Northumberland County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Livingstone C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the site is a suitable location for the development having regard to the housing policies of the development plan
- the effect of the development on the ecology in the area
- whether the site is suitable for development in regard to contamination and ground gas
- whether the proposed housing is in a sustainable location
- whether the proposed development would result in, or increase, the risk of surface water flooding
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and the moderate benefits of housing delivery and energy efficiency do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm to justify very special circumstances.
the modest benefits of housing delivery, energy efficiency, economic activity and more efficient land use (moderate weight) do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness, plus limited additional harm from ecology, contamination and drainage concerns and sustainability issues
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STP8Policy STP1Policy HOU7Policy HOU8Policy ENV2Policy POL1Policy WAT3Policy STP3Policy STP4Policy STP5Policy TRA1Policy TRA2Policy Des1 of the Morpeth Neighbourhood Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R (Tate) v Northumberland County Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1519
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Northumberland County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 October 20266011490Land North West of Ivy Cottage, Whittonstall, DH8 9JN
- Dismissed16 October 2026601049113 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA
- Dismissed13 October 20266009232Land East of Monks Lodge, Mitford, NE61 2YJ
- Dismissed29 September 202660126272 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL
- Allowed24 September 20266010440Land South West Of Chalets Percy Wood Golf Club And Country Retreat, Coast View, Swarland, NE65 9JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®