Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 February 20253352006

Land west of road from Trevithick Hill to Edge Corner, Polmassick, St Austell, Cornwall, PL26 6EZ

residential development – erection of three dwellings

Authority
Cornwall Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Roberts G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be acceptable having regard to local and national planning policies on the location of new housing
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm to rural character and landscape setting, combined with poor accessibility and unsustainability, outweighs the moderate benefits of housing delivery even under the tilted balance test.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery, short-term employment and green space were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, poor sustainability and accessibility, and conflict with up-to-date development plan policies, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 83, 135, 139, 187

Plan policies cited: Policy 1 (Presumption in favour of sustainable development), Policy 2 (Spatial strategy), Policy 3 (Role and function of places), Policy 7 (Housing in the countryside), Policy 9, Policy 12, Policy 23, Policy 27 (Transport and accessibility), Policy T1 (Sustainable transport), Policy C1 (7)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.