Planning appeal decision
Betchworth Works, Ifield Road, Charlwood, Horley, Surrey, RH6 0DX
Planning appeal 3352137 at Betchworth Works, Ifield Road, Charlwood, Horley, Surrey, RH6 0DX (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 8 May 2025 by Inspector Cahalane R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to purposes (a), (b), and (d) in paragraph 143 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Outline Application for the erection of up to 3 no. dwellings with associated parking and amenity space, with all matters reserved
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cahalane R
- Postcode
- RH6 0DX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to purposes (a), (b), and (d) in paragraph 143 of the National Planning Policy Framework
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development for the purposes of the Framework and the development plan
- the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The failure to secure the proposed affordable housing through a legal agreement means the development cannot benefit from the Framework exception for limited affordable housing and therefore constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, which cannot be justified by the other considerations advanced.
The benefits of providing three affordable dwellings to meet identified local need and efficient use of land near services were afforded limited weight and do not clearly outweigh the substantial weight to be attached to harm to the Green Belt (inappropriate development and moderate loss of openness) and harm to character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H4Policy EN1Policy EN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
- Judgments
- R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 3
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®