Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20253352137

Betchworth Works, Ifield Road, Charlwood, Horley, Surrey, RH6 0DX

Planning appeal 3352137 at Betchworth Works, Ifield Road, Charlwood, Horley, Surrey, RH6 0DX (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 8 May 2025 by Inspector Cahalane R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to purposes (a), (b), and (d) in paragraph 143 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Outline Application for the erection of up to 3 no. dwellings with associated parking and amenity space, with all matters reserved

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cahalane R
Postcode
RH6 0DX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to purposes (a), (b), and (d) in paragraph 143 of the National Planning Policy Framework
  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development for the purposes of the Framework and the development plan
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The failure to secure the proposed affordable housing through a legal agreement means the development cannot benefit from the Framework exception for limited affordable housing and therefore constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, which cannot be justified by the other considerations advanced.

The benefits of providing three affordable dwellings to meet identified local need and efficient use of land near services were afforded limited weight and do not clearly outweigh the substantial weight to be attached to harm to the Green Belt (inappropriate development and moderate loss of openness) and harm to character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H4Policy EN1Policy EN4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
Judgments
R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

34 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
  5. Dismissed9 September 20266005433
    Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.