Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 May 20253352164

Rear of 28 Olyffe Avenue, Welling, Kent, DA16 3HZ

Planning appeal 3352164 at Rear of 28 Olyffe Avenue, Welling, Kent, DA16 3HZ (London Borough of Bexley) was dismissed on 7 May 2025 by Inspector Housden C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of a detached single storey dwelling with refuse storage and parking to the front following demolition of existing garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Housden C
Postcode
DA16 3HZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the appeal proposal would deliver a biodiversity net gain
  • Whether the appeal proposal makes appropriate provisions in relation to fire safety

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan on three material grounds—character and appearance, biodiversity net gain, and fire safety—and the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply where a proposal does not accord with the development plan.

The limited benefit of a single windfall dwelling was outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance and unresolved conflicts with biodiversity and fire safety policies

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP5 of the Bexley Local Plan (2023)Policy DP11 of the Bexley Local Plan (2023)Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy DP20 of the Bexley Local Plan (2023)Policy G6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy D12 of the London Plan (2021)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

218 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bexley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266013098
    Rear Of 110-112 Belvedere Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4PF
  2. Allowed19 October 20266010781
    126 Crayford Road, Crayford, Dartford, DA1 4ES
  3. Allowed12 October 20266004983
    Land to the Rear of No. 48 Sidcup High Street, Bexley, DA14 6EH
  4. Allowed2 October 20266012368
    35 Cumberland Drive, Bexleyheath, DA7 5LA
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012819
    17 Percy Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4DZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.