Planning appeal decision
By-Pass Nurseries, Bramford Road, Bramford, Suffolk, IP8 4BA
Planning appeal 3352607 at By-Pass Nurseries, Bramford Road, Bramford, Suffolk, IP8 4BA (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 4 February 2025 by Inspector Raygen Z, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location of the appeal site is appropriate for housing and employment having regard to local and national policy.
the erection of 11 dwellings (including 4 affordable) and one commercial unit (class E use)
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Raygen Z
- Postcode
- IP8 4BA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the location of the appeal site is appropriate for housing and employment having regard to local and national policy
- Whether the proposal includes an acceptable mix of housing
- Whether the proposal provides an acceptable level of affordable housing
- Whether the location and design of the affordable housing is acceptable
- The effect of the proposal on flooding
- Whether the proposal provides safe and suitable access for all
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the development on biodiversity
- The effect of the proposal on Early Years place provision
What decided it
The proposal's cumulative conflicts with the development plan—particularly the spatial strategy, housing mix, affordable housing integration, flood risk management, and biodiversity net gain requirements—were not outweighed by the housing benefits and accessibility, notwithstanding the Council's demonstrated five-year housing land supply.
The substantial weight given to housing delivery and the moderate weight given to economic and social benefits were insufficient to outweigh the conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP03Policy SP05Policy LP10Policy SP01Policy SP02Policy LP27Policy LP24Policy LP17Policy LP16Policy SP08Policy LP30
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 78Paragraph 125c
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®