Planning appeal decision
Ascot House, Lynch Wood, Peterborough, PE2 6WZ
Planning appeal 3353257 at Ascot House, Lynch Wood, Peterborough, PE2 6WZ (Peterborough City Council) was dismissed on 12 August 2025 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to local and national policy.
‘outline application for the erection of up to 42 one- bedroom apartments on part of existing car park with all matters reserved except access ’
- Authority
- Peterborough City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Moulton E
- Postcode
- PE2 6WZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to local and national policy
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety, having particular regard to its impact on the highway network, and the adequacy of the proposed access and parking provision
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the area
- Whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for the future occupiers of the proposal and maintained for the occupiers of Ascot House, with particular regard to privacy, outlook, noise, anti-social behaviour, on-site open space, and internal space
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that the cumulative impact of the proposal combined with the approved conversion of Ascot House would not result in severe residual impacts on the highway network, coupled with the conflict with the spatial strategy for the business park, outweighed the housing benefits even in the context of a minor shortfall in five-year housing land supply.
The benefits of 42 additional dwellings and affordable housing contribution were outweighed by the moderate weight of harm from the unsuitable location conflicting with employment protection policy, undemonstrated highway safety, and policy-non-compliant affordable housing provision, such that the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP4LP8LP13LP16LP17LP21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Peterborough
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed21 October 20266011357310 Lincoln Road, Peterborough, PE1 2ND
- Dismissed15 October 2026600885043, Priestgate, Peterborough, PE1 1AR
- Dismissed14 October 202660106601 Mayors Walk, Peterborough, PE3 6EU
- Allowed6 October 20266009036Dobbies Garden Centre, Phorpres Way, Cygnet Park, Peterborough, PE7 8NY
- Dismissed28 September 2026601264275-79 New Road, Peterborough, PE1 1TZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®