Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 February 20253353292

Sugar Lane Cottage , Sugar Lane , Sible Hedingham , CO9 3LX

conversion of a stables to an annexe, closure of existing access to the dwelling

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Price J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal can demonstrate a physical and functional relationship with the host dwelling and be considered as annex accommodation, taking account of development plan policy and any other material considerations

What decided it

The removal of the existing drive and the shared use of access, garden, parking, garaging, laundry and storage facilities between the host dwelling and the proposed annexe demonstrated the required physical and functional relationship to satisfy LP Policy LPP36 criterion h.

Plan policies cited: Policy LPP1, Policy LPP36

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.