Planning appeal decision
R/O Wellsfield, Blunham, MK44 3PL
use of land for the stationing of 5 mobile homes for tourism and stationing of a mobile home for agricultural purposes and use of land for agriculture
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Harding C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal is acceptable in respect of flood risk having regard to national and local policies and guidance
- the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area, including the significance of the setting of Blunham Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of occupiers of existing dwellings with particular regard to disturbance
- the effect of the proposal upon highway safety
- the effect of the proposal upon biodiversity
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to the spatial strategy
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan on multiple grounds—flood risk, heritage harm, living conditions, highway safety, and biodiversity—and no material considerations justify departure from the development plan.
Framework references: 174, 181, 208, 15
Plan policies cited: Policy CC3, Policy CC5, Policy EE5, Policy HQ1, Policy HE3, Policy T2, Policy EE2, Policy SP7, Policy EMP4
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®