Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 May 20253354171

Land to Rear 34 Sunnybank, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9SR

Planning appeal 3354171 at Land to Rear 34 Sunnybank, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9SR (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 23 May 2025 by Inspector Miles H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of single story dwelling with off road parking and private garden

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Miles H
Postcode
CR6 9SR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Flood risk

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and to flood risk would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development would not apply.

The modest benefits of providing one new dwelling in a sustainable location were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and to flood risk; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008)Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014)Policy DP8 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014)Policy DP21 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

99 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed25 September 20266006497
    Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
  2. Allowed13 July 20266002345
    Land Adjacent to Heathview, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6LG
  3. Allowed13 July 20266002255
    Winnies Woodland, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, Lingfield, RH7 6LG
  4. Allowed8 July 20266002898
    Land at Longsdon Way, Caterham, CR3 6BN
  5. Dismissed23 June 20266002299
    Eliza's Yard, Willey Lane, Chaldon, Caterham, CR3 6AR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.