Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 May 20253354171

Land to rear 34 Sunnybank, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9SR

erection of single story dwelling with off road parking and private garden

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Flood risk

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and to flood risk would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development would not apply.

The modest benefits of providing one new dwelling in a sustainable location were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and to flood risk; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy (2008), Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DP8 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DP21 of the Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies (2014)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.