Planning appeal decision
Land at Longsdon Way, Caterham, CR3 6BN
Planning appeal 6002898 at Land at Longsdon Way, Caterham, CR3 6BN (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 8 July 2026 by Inspector H Miles, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 (Framework) and any relevant development plan policies, including whether the site is Grey Belt land.
42 affordable dwellings, green infrastructure, public open space, biodiversity enhancements, parking, and vehicular and pedestrian access arrangements
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- H Miles
- Postcode
- CR3 6BN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 (Framework) and any relevant development plan policies, including whether the site is Grey Belt land.
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV).
- The effect of the proposed development on ecology with particular regard to the lowland calcareous grassland.
What decided it
The severe and persistent shortfall in housing and affordable housing delivery, engaging the NPPF paragraph 11(d) tilted balance, meant the very substantial benefits of the 42 affordable dwellings outweighed the moderate identified harms.
the very substantial benefits of 42 affordable dwellings, Golden Rules compliance and biodiversity gains outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance and limited-weight conflict with the settlement boundary policy, so the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under paragraph 11(d)
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP7Policy DP16Policy CSP4Policy CSP11Policy CSP17Policy CSP18Policy CSP20Policy CSP1Policy CCW4Policy CCW4DPolicy CCW13Policy CCW15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 159Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®