Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20253354511

1 Essex Close, Romford, RM7 8BD

Planning appeal 3354511 at 1 Essex Close, Romford, RM7 8BD (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 24 April 2025 by Inspector Deane G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area.

the conversion of existing side extension, single storey rear extension and new 2-storey side/rear extension to form 2 additional dwellings (total 3 including existing)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Deane G
Postcode
RM7 8BD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area
  • The effect on the living conditions of future occupiers and those of properties on Toby Way with regard to visual impact
  • The effect on highway safety for users of Essex Close

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area caused by overdevelopment of the site and the disjointed design of the proposed terrace outweighs the modest benefits of providing 2 additional homes in the absence of a 5-year housing supply.

The modest benefits from the provision of 2 additional homes and economic benefits attracted moderate weight, but the significant harm to character and appearance and conflicts with development plan and Framework policies attracted significant weight, resulting in adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7Policy 26Policy 23Policy 24Policy T4 of The London Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

358 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266001193
    Archers Apartments, 27 Haysoms Close, Romford, Havering, RM1 4DL
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004142
    1 Abbots Close, Havering, Rainham, Essex, RM13 9LA
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.