Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 March 20253354571

88 East Avenue, Hillingdon, Hayes, UB3 2HR

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sims B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the living conditions that would be available to occupiers of the proposed flat, with regard to internal accommodation standards and private amenity space
  • the effect of the development, including the modifications to the ground floor, on the appearance and character of the appeal property frontage and the wider street scene of East Avenue
  • the potential impacts of the creation of the proposed basement in the absence of a basement impact assessment
  • the effects the addition of the first-floor extension would have on the living conditions at the neighbouring property with regard to outlook and natural lighting

What decided it

The proposal failed to meet adopted space standards for internal accommodation and private amenity space, and the proposed basement was unacceptably contrary to policy due to the absence of a required basement impact assessment.

Plan policies cited: Policy DMHB16, Policy D6, Policy DMHB18, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHD3, Policy D3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.