Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 February 20253354585

Land South of Brent Eleigh Road, Monks Eleigh, Suffolk, IP7 7 JG

erection of three self build dwellings

Authority
Babergh District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the Council's spatial strategy and the Framework
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Monks Eleigh Conservation Area and the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • the effect on protected species
  • the effect on highway safety
  • whether there are other considerations that indicate a decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan, with particular reference to the proposed provision of self-build housing and any other benefits of the proposal

What decided it

The considerable weight attached to the less than substantial heritage harm to the Conservation Area, combined with conflict with the spatial strategy and unmitigated ecological harm, was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of self-build housing and other considerations.

The less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area, together with the conflict with the spatial strategy and the unmitigated risk to protected species, outweighed the moderate collective benefits of self-build housing delivery, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

Framework references: 83, 215, 57, 73

Plan policies cited: Policy SP03, Policy LP08, Policy SP09, Policy LP19, Policy LP16, Policy LP29

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.