Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20253355007

Five Acre, Alverdiscott Road, Bideford, Devon, EX39 4PP

Planning appeal 3355007 at Five Acre, Alverdiscott Road, Bideford, Devon, EX39 4PP (Torridge District Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2025 by Inspector Butcher C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

5m extension to west elevation replacing 6m larger extension, roof removed and replaced with first floor, increased curtilage for access and larger garden, existing vehicular access blocked with trees and shrubs, utilisation of 2nd access in north boundary

Authority
Torridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Butcher C
Postcode
EX39 4PP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether the arrangements for foul drainage would be satisfactory

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the incongruous modern design and substantial increase in built form in a low-density rural landscape, which alone was sufficient to dismiss the appeal.

No material considerations, either individually or in combination, outweighed the identified harm to character and appearance and associated development plan conflict.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ST04Policy DM04Policy DM08aPolicy ST14Policy DM25Policy DM02

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

2 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Torridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed16 September 20266009632
    Land At Grid Reference 235658 108325, Holsworthy Beacon, Holsworthy, EX22 7NE
  2. Dismissed1 September 20266010166
    Nectar Haze, Bounds Cross, Pyworthy, EX22 6LH
  3. Dismissed12 August 20266009975
    Land Adjacent Allwyn, Staddon Road, Holsworthy, EX22 6NH
  4. Allowed6 July 20266006878
    Land At Pitt Bungalow, Pitt Lane, Appledore, EX39 1QB
  5. Dismissed18 May 20266004820
    Land At Grid Reference 243890 125702, High Park Close, Bideford, Devon, EX39 3HJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.