Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20253355047

26 Basing Way, THAMES DITTON, KT7 0NX

a part two/part single-storey rear extension, roof extension incorporating rear dormer windows, front canopy, conversion of garage into living space and alterations to fenestration

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cramond D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the locality

What decided it

The excessive bulk, mass and overdevelopment of the scheme, particularly the uncharacteristic crown roof which would appear visually awkward and out of place in the established suburban streetscene, conflicting with development plan policies requiring designs that reflect local character and enhance the street-scene.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM2, Policy CS17

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.