Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 June 20253355577

Land north of 2 Littleheath Farm Cottage, Steels Lane, Oxshott, Surrey, KT22 0RX

conversion of existing detached outbuilding to create a self-contained 2 bedroom residential dwelling house with associated external alterations and parking

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is subject to the mandatory requirements for biodiversity net gain, and if so, does it comply with them
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers

What decided it

The proposal fails to demonstrate compliance with the mandatory requirements for biodiversity net gain under Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, which constitutes an adverse impact that significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery.

The benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing contribution were outweighed by the failure to comply with mandatory biodiversity net gain requirements, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 187

Plan policies cited: DM2, DM10, CS10, CS17

Judgments cited: Camden London Borough Council v ADC Estates Limited (1991) 61P&CR 48; R. (on the application of Morris Homes (North) Ltd) v Bolton Council [2025] EWHC 657 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.