Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Lower Wood Farm, Sundon Road, Harlington, Beds, LU5 6LN
Planning appeal 3355615 at Land Adjacent to Lower Wood Farm, Sundon Road, Harlington, Beds, LU5 6LN (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 31 July 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework.
the construction of up to 8 residential dwellings with associated access, parking and amenity/open space
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Goldberg V
- Postcode
- LU5 6LN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal, and the removal of the hedgerow to facilitate the vehicular access, on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside
- the effect of the proposal on ecology, protected species, and biodiversity
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause significant harm to openness and character, and the appellant has not demonstrated adequate mitigation for protected species impacts, with the benefits not clearly outweighing these harms to establish very special circumstances.
The benefits of providing eight dwellings would not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, significant harm to openness, unacceptable erosion of pastoral rural character, and unresolved harm to Great Crested Newts, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy EE4Policy EE5Policy SP7Policy EE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
- Judgments
- Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®