Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20253355615

Land Adjacent to Lower Wood Farm, Sundon Road, Harlington, Beds, LU5 6LN

Planning appeal 3355615 at Land Adjacent to Lower Wood Farm, Sundon Road, Harlington, Beds, LU5 6LN (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 31 July 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework.

the construction of up to 8 residential dwellings with associated access, parking and amenity/open space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Goldberg V
Postcode
LU5 6LN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is grey belt land and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal, and the removal of the hedgerow to facilitate the vehicular access, on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology, protected species, and biodiversity
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause significant harm to openness and character, and the appellant has not demonstrated adequate mitigation for protected species impacts, with the benefits not clearly outweighing these harms to establish very special circumstances.

The benefits of providing eight dwellings would not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, significant harm to openness, unacceptable erosion of pastoral rural character, and unresolved harm to Great Crested Newts, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy EE4Policy EE5Policy SP7Policy EE3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
Judgments
Wood v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  2. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266005439
    263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266007697
    142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.