Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 July 20253355653

2 Pondhue Cottages, Anchor Hill, Knaphill, Woking, GU21 2HL

Planning appeal 3355653 at 2 Pondhue Cottages, Anchor Hill, Knaphill, Woking, GU21 2HL (Woking Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 July 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

removal of garage from existing rear garden and construction of a new three bedroom detached house in the garden between the houses at no`s. 2 and 3 Pondhue Cottages to include a cycle shed and two no. parking bays

Authority
Woking Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
De Freitas Terceiro P
Postcode
GU21 2HL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the present occupiers of No 2 Pondhue Cottages, with particular reference to the provision of private outdoor space and outlook
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to the provision of private outdoor space and internal space

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan through harmful effects on character and appearance and highway safety, which are not outweighed by the limited housing benefit of a single dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS10CS21CS18DM10DM11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

103 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Woking Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266005542
    6 Beaufort Close, Maybury, Woking, GU22 8DA
  2. Dismissed14 July 20266006124
    155 Albert Drive, Woking, GU215QY
  3. Allowed10 July 20266005819
    2 Sanway Close, Byflet, West Byfleet, KT14 7SP
  4. Allowed20 March 20263368124
    Land to the Rear of Lingcroft and Flats 1 and 2 , Lingcroft, Pyrford Road, West Byfleet, KT12 6QS
  5. Allowed18 November 20253370634
    13 Boltons Lane, Woking, GU22 8TL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.