Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20253355677

26 Valentines Way, Rush Green, Romford, RM7 0YH

Planning appeal 3355677 at 26 Valentines Way, Rush Green, Romford, RM7 0YH (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 3 June 2025 by Inspector Desai S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

Construction of a front porch, a first floor side extension, a part two storey part single storey rear extension and conversion of existing garage into a habitable space

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Desai S
Postcode
RM7 0YH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, overshadowing and daylight

What decided it

The first-floor side extension would disrupt the architectural symmetry and spacing of the semi-detached pair and the single-storey rear extension would cause unacceptable overbearing harm to the outlook and daylight of the neighbouring occupiers at No. 24.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021)Policy SP2 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham's Local Plan 2020-2037 (2024)Policy DMD1 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham's Local Plan 2020-2037 (2024)Policy DMD5 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham's Local Plan 2020-2037 (2024)Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (2012)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

262 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 September 20266011342
    Land Rear Of Ship And Anchor, Wood Lane, Dagenham, Barking And Dagenham, RM8 1DR
  2. Notice varied and upheld11 June 20263347715
    Land on the South Eastern Side of Collier Row Road , Romford , Essex , RM5 2BH
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266007197
    24 Mayfair Avenue, London, RM6 6UB
  4. Allowed8 May 20266005041
    59 Mayesbrook Road, Dagenham, RM8 2EA
  5. Dismissed8 May 20266003713
    10 Bowes Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 2XJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.