Planning appeal decision
Greystones Coombe Walk, Yorkletts, Whitstable, CT5 3AL
Planning appeal 3355742 at Greystones Coombe Walk, Yorkletts, Whitstable, CT5 3AL (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 12 June 2025 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the appeal proposal having regard to the Council's strategy for the location of development.
the demolition of existing dwelling. 2no 2 storey detached dwellings with detached garages and associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Francis L
- Postcode
- CT5 3AL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the appeal proposal having regard to the Council's strategy for the location of development
- the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the appeal proposal on the integrity of the European designated sites
What decided it
The significant harm arising from the unsustainable location of the proposed development and harm to the character and appearance of the area significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
The limited benefits of housing supply and small contribution to windfall completions were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm from unsustainable location and conflict with key Framework policies directing development to sustainable locations and ensuring developments are sympathetic to local character.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HD4Policy SP1Policy DBE3Policy LB5Policy SP6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 September 20266008107Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Dismissed28 September 20266008105Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Allowed24 September 2026601061482 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
- Allowed18 September 20266009081Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
- Dismissed11 August 2026600962869 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®