Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20253356000

1, 3, 5 Tweed Way and 368, 370, 372, 374 Havering Road, ROMFORD, RM1 4AZ

the erection of a single storey rear extension at 1 Tweed Way, Romford RM1 4AZ, 3 Tweed Way, Romford RM1 4AZ, 5 Tweed Way, Romford RM1 4AZ and 368 Havering Road, Romford RM1 4FE, 370 Havering Road, Romford RM1 4FE, 372 Havering Road, Romford RM1 4FE, 374 Havering Road, Romford RM1 4FE

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Unknown
Inspector
Deane G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the local area
  • Whether the proposal in Appeal A would provide satisfactory living conditions for the occupiers of No 368 with particular regard to outlook and sense of enclosure

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the host buildings and local area caused by the proposed extensions, which conflicts with the development plan with no material considerations to indicate otherwise.

Plan policies cited: Policy 7, Policy 26, Policy D6 of The London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.