Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 February 20253356015

3 The Mint, Church Hill, Canterbury , Kent , CT2 9AA

Replacement of wooden bow window with UPVC window of same size, shape and detail

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, with due regard to the location of the site in the Harbledown conservation area and the host property's designation as a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The visual disruptiveness of UPVC material and finish, which appears incongruous alongside remaining timber windows in the terrace, causes less than substantial harm to the conservation area and non-designated heritage asset that is not outweighed by the limited public benefits of improved insulation.

Plan policies cited: Policy DBE3, Policy HE1, Policy HE6, Policy HE8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.