Planning appeal decision
3 The Mint, Church Hill, Canterbury , Kent , CT2 9AA
Replacement of wooden bow window with UPVC window of same size, shape and detail
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Pattison B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, with due regard to the location of the site in the Harbledown conservation area and the host property's designation as a non-designated heritage asset
What decided it
The visual disruptiveness of UPVC material and finish, which appears incongruous alongside remaining timber windows in the terrace, causes less than substantial harm to the conservation area and non-designated heritage asset that is not outweighed by the limited public benefits of improved insulation.
Plan policies cited: Policy DBE3, Policy HE1, Policy HE6, Policy HE8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®