Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20253356351

Land at St Sebastians Close, Nine Mile Ride, Crowthorne, Berkshire, RG40 3XA

Planning appeal 3356351 at Land at St Sebastians Close, Nine Mile Ride, Crowthorne, Berkshire, RG40 3XA (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 April 2025 by Inspector Willis S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

construction of 6 x 2-bedroom dwellinghouses (Use Class C3) together with associated access road, parking, landscaping, refuse storage and private amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Willis S
Postcode
RG40 3XA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development with regard to the local strategy and accessibility to services and facilities
  • Whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers with regard to outdoor space, outlook, privacy and security
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of St Sebastian's Court with regard to privacy and outlook
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The significant and cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions of both future and existing occupiers, and uncertain but potentially significant biodiversity impacts, when weighed against moderate housing supply benefits, demonstrably outweighed the scheme's advantages under both the development plan and the Framework.

The moderate weight given to housing supply contribution and small weight to construction, occupation and energy efficiency benefits were substantially outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance, significant harm to living conditions of future occupiers (plots 2, 3 and 1), significant harm to living conditions of existing occupiers of St Sebastian's Court through privacy loss, and significant weight to uncertain biodiversity harm; the adverse impacts demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy CP3Policy CP11Policy CP2Policy CP6Policy CP9Policy CP17Policy CP7Policy CC02Policy CC03Policy TB06Policy TB21Policy TB23Policy P11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

61 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed21 July 20266008845
    Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
  2. Dismissed9 March 20263361360
    Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
  3. Allowed2 February 20263375029
    1 Halstead Close, Woodley, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG5 4LD
  4. Allowed26 November 20253363174
    178 Bearwood Road, Barkham, Wokingham, RG41 4SH
  5. Dismissed27 October 20253364902
    Land East of Warren Lodge, Warren Lane, Finchampstead, RG40 4HR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.