Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20253356351

Land at St Sebastians Close, Nine Mile Ride, Crowthorne, Berkshire, RG40 3XA

construction of 6 x 2-bedroom dwellinghouses (Use Class C3) together with associated access road, parking, landscaping, refuse storage and private amenity space

Authority
Wokingham Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Willis S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development with regard to the local strategy and accessibility to services and facilities
  • Whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers with regard to outdoor space, outlook, privacy and security
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of St Sebastian's Court with regard to privacy and outlook
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The significant and cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions of both future and existing occupiers, and uncertain but potentially significant biodiversity impacts, when weighed against moderate housing supply benefits, demonstrably outweighed the scheme's advantages under both the development plan and the Framework.

The moderate weight given to housing supply contribution and small weight to construction, occupation and energy efficiency benefits were substantially outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance, significant harm to living conditions of future occupiers (plots 2, 3 and 1), significant harm to living conditions of existing occupiers of St Sebastian's Court through privacy loss, and significant weight to uncertain biodiversity harm; the adverse impacts demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CP1, Policy CP3, Policy CP11, Policy CP2, Policy CP6, Policy CP9, Policy CP17, Policy CP7, Policy CC02, Policy CC03, Policy TB06, Policy TB21, Policy TB23, Policy P11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.