Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20253356621

21 Priory Road, ROMFORD, RM3 9AP

the subdivision of the plot to facilitate the erection of a single storey, three- bed, detached dwelling with associated car parking and amenity space and the creation of a new vehicular access

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Whitfield H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including trees
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 21 and 23 Priory Road, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, when weighed against the modest contribution to housing supply from a single dwelling, resulted in adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

The significant harm to character and appearance and substandard living conditions for future occupants (significant weight) substantially outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery and efficient use of land (moderate weight), such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy 7, Policy 10, Policy 26, Policy 27, Policy 30, Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.