Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 June 20253356736

100-102A High Street, Hornchurch, RM12 4UH

Planning appeal 3356736 at 100-102A High Street, Hornchurch, RM12 4UH (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 9 June 2025 by Inspector Leigh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers of the flat, with particular reference to amenity space provision, refuse storage provision, and noise disturbance.

the change of use from empty office to one 3 bedroom flat

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Leigh C
Postcode
RM12 4UH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers of the flat, with particular reference to amenity space provision, refuse storage provision, and noise disturbance

What decided it

The proposed dwelling would not provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation due to inadequate amenity space, unaddressed noise disturbance, and poor refuse storage provision, which conflicts with the development plan and cannot be resolved by conditions.

The benefits of housing delivery and economic boost during construction were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of providing a dwelling that fails to meet development plan standards for residential accommodation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 34 of the Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

371 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.