Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 July 20253356739

Land Between St Teresa and Glen Cottage, Clapham Hill, Whitstable, CT5 3DL

Planning appeal 3356739 at Land Between St Teresa and Glen Cottage, Clapham Hill, Whitstable, CT5 3DL (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 30 July 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on protected species.

2 No. Detached 4 Bed Dwellings with associated Parking

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on protected species
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • whether the proposed dwellings would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies concerned with housing in rural areas and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities

What decided it

The potential harm to protected species and biodiversity, combined with the harmful effect on highway safety, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of providing two additional dwellings in an area with inadequate housing supply.

The benefits of housing delivery (significant weight) were outweighed by the considerable weight attached to potential ecological harm and the significant weight attached to harmful effects on highway safety, assessed against the Framework policies as a whole under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LB9Policy DBE3Policy T9Policy SP4Policy HD4Policy SP1Policy LB10Policy SP6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 99Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 11Paragraph 193

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

48 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266008107
    Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266008105
    Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  3. Allowed24 September 20266010614
    82 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
  4. Allowed18 September 20266009081
    Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
  5. Dismissed11 August 20266009628
    69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.