Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 April 20253356971

1 Hurstfield Crescent, HAYES, UB4 8DN

change of use from a 6 unit small HMO (Use Class C4) to a 7 unit HMO (Sui Generis) for up to 7 people

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wilson D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be tantamount to the creation of a self-contained flat

What decided it

The access arrangements and planning description restricting the second floor to shared HMO use, combined with the Council's acceptance of the principle and absence of harm to neighbours, parking or highways, meant the development would not be tantamount to creating a self-contained flat.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy D6, Policy T6, Policy DMH 5, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHB 16, Policy DMHB 18, Policy DMHD 1, Policy DMT 1, Policy DMT 2, Policy DMT 6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.