Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 August 20253357250

Land at Lower Broad Oak Road, West Hill, EX11 1XH

outline planning application for the construction of 5 no. dwellings, with all matters reserved

Authority
East Devon District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Nicholls H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the location of the development accords with the development plan in terms of accessibility to facilities and reducing the need to travel
  • the effects of the proposal on species and habitats
  • the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including on a locally valued view

What decided it

The absence of a five-year housing land supply, combined with the modest but valuable contribution of five dwellings and the ability to mitigate ecological and landscape impacts through conditions, meant the presumption in favour of sustainable development indicated permission should be granted despite conflict with the development plan.

The adverse impacts of harm to character, appearance and loss of a locally valued view were outweighed by the benefits of delivering five dwellings to address the housing supply shortage, with the presumption in favour of sustainable development tipping the balance in favour of permission.

Framework references: 11, 110

Plan policies cited: Strategy 1, Strategy 5B, Strategy 7, Strategy 27, Strategy 47, Policy TC2, Policy D1, Policy EN5, Policy EN14, Policy NP1, Policy NP3, Policy NP6

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.