Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 June 20253357595

460 Daws Heath Road, BENFLEET, Essex, SS7 2UD

replace existing dwelling and outbuildings with three detached residential units comprising chalet style two storey dwellings fronting Daws Heath Road, together with ancillary car parking and landscaping

Authority
Castle Point Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dring G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness that is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

the substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, together with insufficient BNG information, was not clearly outweighed by moderate weight given to housing supply, economic benefits, and design compliance

Framework references: 11, 143, 153, 154

Judgments cited: Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.