Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20253357648

Stables South East of Ridgeways, Hey Lane, Outlane, Elland, HX4 9LQ

demolition of existing stables to facilitate a detached dwelling

Authority
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Major R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt considering the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt, and having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing with respect to the accessibility of local facilities and sustainable modes of transport
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Barkisland-Holwell Green Landscape Character Area and the Ringstone Edge and Norland Moor Fringes Special Landscape Area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development, combined with moderate harm to character and appearance and the unsustainable location, are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, meaning very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

Framework references: 11, 84, 153, 154, 232

Plan policies cited: Policy GB1, Policy CC1, Policy IM4, Policy IM5, Policy GN4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.