Planning appeal decision
Stables South East of Ridgeways, Hey Lane, Outlane, Elland, HX4 9LQ
Planning appeal 3357648 at Stables South East of Ridgeways, Hey Lane, Outlane, Elland, HX4 9LQ (Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2025 by Inspector Major R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt considering the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt, and having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
demolition of existing stables to facilitate a detached dwelling
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Major R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt considering the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt, and having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- whether the proposed development would provide a suitable location for housing with respect to the accessibility of local facilities and sustainable modes of transport
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Barkisland-Holwell Green Landscape Character Area and the Ringstone Edge and Norland Moor Fringes Special Landscape Area
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of the development, combined with moderate harm to character and appearance and the unsustainable location, are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, meaning very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy CC1Policy IM4Policy IM5Policy GN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Calderdale
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed22 October 20266012724Mona Cottage, 1 Dewsbury Road, Elland, HX5 9JU
- Allowed12 October 2026600957629 Syke Lane, Lightcliffe, Brighouse, HX3 8SY
- Dismissed9 October 20266008120Ashdene, Syke Lane, Ogden, Halifax, HX2 9NU
- Dismissed3 September 20266008062Land North of Helm Farm Cottages, Helm Lane, Triangle, Sowerby Bridge, HX6 3DU
- Allowed1 September 20266010078Windmill Court County House, Keighley Road, Illingworth,, Halifax, HX2 8YB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®