Planning appeal decision
Land South of Hencliffe Way & West of Castle Farm Rd, Hanham, Bristol, BS15 3TB
Planning appeal 3357956 at Land South of Hencliffe Way & West of Castle Farm Rd, Hanham, Bristol, BS15 3TB (South Gloucestershire Council) was allowed on 4 July 2025 by Inspector Nunn M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework.
‘outline planning application for the demolition of 1 dwelling and the erection of up to 140 dwellings, provision of public open space, landscaping and planting, drainage and ancillary works, with all matters reserved except for means of site access’
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nunn M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the landscape
- the effect on living conditions at No 62 and No 66 Hencliffe Way, in terms of general disturbance
- the effect on heritage assets
- the overall planning balance
What decided it
The site's classification as 'Grey Belt' land satisfying all the Paragraph 155 criteria meant the proposal was not inappropriate development in the Green Belt, allowing the tilted balance to operate and the substantial housing and other benefits to outweigh the identified harms.
The substantial benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, economic, social and environmental benefits, and accessibility to services clearly outweighed the harms from landscape encroachment, limited living conditions harm, loss of best and most versatile agricultural land and low-level heritage harm, so the tilted balance in favour of granting permission was not displaced.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS1(3)Policy CS2(5)Policy CS5Policy CS5(6)(c)Policy CS9(3)Policy CS9(9)Policy CS15Policy PSP2Policy PSP8Policy PSP40
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 85Paragraph 96Paragraph 116Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 158Paragraph 187Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Hawridge Strategic Land Ltd v SSHCLG and Buckinghamshore Council
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 2026601187149 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
- Allowed25 August 2026600916727 Gloucester Road North, Filton, BS7 0SQ
- Allowed6 August 20266009073Land Associated With 51 Frampton End Road, Frampton Cotterell, Bristol, BS36 2LY
- Dismissed29 July 20266006817Wisteria View, Gloucester Road, Cold Ashton, SN14 8LB
- Allowed9 July 20266008703Land at 42 Teewell Hill, Staple Hill, Bristol, BS16 5PD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®