Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 May 20253357999

26 Basing Way, THAMES DITTON, KT7 0NX

part two/part single-storey rear extension, roof extension incorporating rear dormer windows, front canopy, conversion of garage into living space and alterations to fenestration

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Lawrence E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed roof extension would introduce an uncharacteristic and large flat crown roof that would appear top heavy and unduly bulky, unacceptably detracting from the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area in conflict with development plan policies and SPD guidance.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: CS4, CS17, DM2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.