Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 April 20253358081

29 Huntingfield Way, Egham, TW20 8DU

Planning appeal 3358081 at 29 Huntingfield Way, Egham, TW20 8DU (Runnymede Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 April 2025 by Inspector Miles H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Flood risk with particular regard to whether the proposal would steer new development to areas with the lowest risk of flooding.

erection of a pair of semi-detached dwellings with associated parking, cycle and bin store

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Miles H
Postcode
TW20 8DU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Flood risk with particular regard to whether the proposal would steer new development to areas with the lowest risk of flooding.
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to 29 Huntingfield Way.

What decided it

The proposal's failure of the flood risk sequential test, which provided a strong policy reason for refusal that outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.

The moderate benefits of the scheme (housing delivery, efficient use of land, social and economic benefits) did not outweigh the strong harm from flood risk and the harm to neighbours' living conditions, so the balance tipped against the proposal and it was found to conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EE13Policy EE1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Mead Realisations Ltd v The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities & Anor [2024] EWHC 279 (Admin) (12 February 2024)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

94 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012183
    1-3 Part First Floor, New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2BZ
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266006748
    St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
  3. decided12 October 20266007528
    Land Known to the West of 203-221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
  4. Dismissed12 October 20266006766
    Land to the West of, 203 - 221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
  5. Allowed8 October 20266014548
    12 Caxton Avenue, Addlestone, KT15 1LJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.