Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 June 20253358343

26 Linnet Hill, Rochdale, Lancashire, OL11 4DA

1) erection of a 1.0 metre high wall and 1.5 metre laurel hedge along front boundary of the residential curtilage. 2) erection of an independent 1.8 metre high fence and automated gate within the front garden area of the property. The fence and gate is to be set back into the property a distance of 2.1 metres from the boundary and the back of footway on Linnet Hill

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed composite fence and automated gate would introduce a visually unsympathetic, higher, prominent and formal means of enclosure that would be discordant within the suburban residential character of the area, conflicting with development plan policies and NPPF guidance on well-designed places.

Framework references: 12, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy P3, Policy DM1, Policy JP-P1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.