Planning appeal decision
130 the fairway, ruislip, ha4 0sh
a 5.5m rear extension with 2 roof lights (3m max height, 2.943m eaves height)
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Bradford F
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of both the host dwelling and wider locality
What decided it
The proposed extension, despite exceeding the policy depth limit, would not have an adverse impact on the host property, wider area or street scene due to its modest height, subordinate massing, and obscured visibility from the public realm.
Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHB12, Policy DMHD1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®