Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 May 20253359028

130 the fairway, ruislip, ha4 0sh

a 5.5m rear extension with 2 roof lights (3m max height, 2.943m eaves height)

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bradford F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of both the host dwelling and wider locality

What decided it

The proposed extension, despite exceeding the policy depth limit, would not have an adverse impact on the host property, wider area or street scene due to its modest height, subordinate massing, and obscured visibility from the public realm.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHB12, Policy DMHD1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.