Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 July 20253359114

R/O 15 & 17, Homeway, Romford, RM3 0HD

Planning appeal 3359114 at R/O 15 & 17, Homeway, Romford, RM3 0HD (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 1 July 2025 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the demolition of existing outbuilding and construction of 2 new dwellings with private amenity and off street car parking

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowden N
Postcode
RM3 0HD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees and other ecological interests
  • whether access to the site is sufficient to provide adequate refuse collection

What decided it

The adverse effects on character and appearance, combined with insufficient evidence on ecological impacts and inadequate refuse collection arrangements, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.

The benefits of two additional dwellings were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse effects on character and appearance, uncertain effects on trees and ecology, and inadequate refuse collection arrangements, such that the tilted balance in paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 10Policy 7Policy 26Policy 35
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 139

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

122 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.