Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 July 20253359178

12 Great Central Avenue , Ruislip, HA4 6UD

Planning appeal 3359178 at 12 Great Central Avenue , Ruislip, HA4 6UD (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 23 July 2025 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing bungalow and ancillary building and erection of a detached 2-storey dwelling and separate apartment block containing 4 units

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edwards J
Postcode
HA4 6UD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether it would provide an appropriate housing mix
  • whether it would provide suitable living conditions for future residents
  • its effect on biodiversity and trees
  • the effect on air quality
  • the effect on living conditions at adjoining residences at 14 Great Central Avenue

What decided it

The proposal's conflicts with multiple development plan policies regarding character and appearance, housing mix, living conditions, biodiversity and air quality significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

the harm resulting from policy conflicts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme, including modest housing contribution and good access to services and transport

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BE1DMHB11DMHB12D3DMH2H10DMHB18D6DMHB16G6EM7DMEI7DMHB14DMEI14SI1EM8DMCI7DF1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 124Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

202 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.