Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20253359493

Stables Building in the Land to the Rear of Hampstead Police Station, 26 Rosslyn Hill, London, NW3 1PD

Planning appeal 3359493 at Stables Building in the Land to the Rear of Hampstead Police Station, 26 Rosslyn Hill, London, NW3 1PD (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 7 October 2025 by Inspector Parkin A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the significance of designated heritage assets.

‘change of use and refurbishment of the Stables building including demolition of the existing annex and construction of new two storey building with front windows, bin store and PV panels to provide residential accommodation (C3) ’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Parkin A
Postcode
NW3 1PD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of designated heritage assets
  • affordable housing provision in the area
  • car parking provision in the area

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets (the listed building and conservation area) which was not outweighed by public benefits, and no planning obligations were in place to secure affordable housing and car-free status as required by development plan policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2Policy H4Policy T2Policy DM1Policy DH1Policy DH2Policy DH3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 65Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 232

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

535 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266008940
    Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266009503
    Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL
  3. Allowed15 July 20266005997
    12 Sarre Road, London, NW2 3SL
  4. Notice upheld22 June 20263370592
    Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
  5. Notice upheld22 June 20263370591
    Land at: Fourth-Fifth Floor Duplexes, 18 Stukeley Street, London, WC2B 5LR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.