Planning appeal decision
Norton Croft and Cotswold House, Norton Lindsey, Warwick, CV35 8JL
Planning appeal 3359716 at Norton Croft and Cotswold House, Norton Lindsey, Warwick, CV35 8JL (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 21 July 2025 by Inspector Robinson N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
re-development of the site comprising: Demolition of Norton Croft and other buildings on site. Erection of 3no. single dwellings. Extensions and alterations to Cotswold House
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Robinson N
- Postcode
- CV35 8JL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to risk of damage or injury from cricket balls
- Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to refuse collection arrangements
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would make satisfactory arrangements in relation to drainage
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that appropriate mitigation measures would be provided to protect future occupiers from risk of injury and damage to property and vehicles from cricket balls meant the proposal could not provide satisfactory living conditions, which outweighed the housing delivery benefits.
The significant weight attached to housing delivery benefits was outweighed by the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DS18BE3BE1FW2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Allowed2 September 20266007651Land to the South of Harbury Lane, Warwick, CV34 7BR
- Allowed18 August 20266002759Land South of, Westwood Heath Road, Coventry, CV4 8LG
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®