Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 July 20253359716

Norton Croft and Cotswold House, Norton Lindsey, Warwick, CV35 8JL

Planning appeal 3359716 at Norton Croft and Cotswold House, Norton Lindsey, Warwick, CV35 8JL (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 21 July 2025 by Inspector Robinson N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

re-development of the site comprising: Demolition of Norton Croft and other buildings on site. Erection of 3no. single dwellings. Extensions and alterations to Cotswold House

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robinson N
Postcode
CV35 8JL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to risk of damage or injury from cricket balls
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to refuse collection arrangements
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would make satisfactory arrangements in relation to drainage
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that appropriate mitigation measures would be provided to protect future occupiers from risk of injury and damage to property and vehicles from cricket balls meant the proposal could not provide satisfactory living conditions, which outweighed the housing delivery benefits.

The significant weight attached to housing delivery benefits was outweighed by the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DS18BE3BE1FW2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Warwick

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011601
    Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
  2. Dismissed23 September 20266006637
    Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
  3. Allowed2 September 20266007651
    Land to the South of Harbury Lane, Warwick, CV34 7BR
  4. Allowed18 August 20266002759
    Land South of, Westwood Heath Road, Coventry, CV4 8LG
  5. Allowed27 July 20266004371
    South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.