Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 July 20253359716

Norton Croft and Cotswold House, Norton Lindsey, WARWICK, CV35 8JL

re-development of the site comprising: Demolition of Norton Croft and other buildings on site. Erection of 3no. single dwellings. Extensions and alterations to Cotswold House

Authority
Warwick District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robinson N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to risk of damage or injury from cricket balls
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to refuse collection arrangements
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would make satisfactory arrangements in relation to drainage
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that appropriate mitigation measures would be provided to protect future occupiers from risk of injury and damage to property and vehicles from cricket balls meant the proposal could not provide satisfactory living conditions, which outweighed the housing delivery benefits.

The significant weight attached to housing delivery benefits was outweighed by the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 110, 115, 143, 155, 156, 157

Plan policies cited: DS18, BE3, BE1, FW2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.